Cals
Cals › Savoury spreads › Compare › Coles Cashew Butter vs Lotus Biscoff Crunchy Spread

Coles Cashew Butter vs Lotus Biscoff Crunchy Spread

Per 100 g, Coles Cashew Butter has less sugar (5.4 vs 36.2), less sodium (6 vs 240), more protein (19.4 vs 3.2) than Lotus Biscoff Crunchy Spread.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Coles Cashew Butter
Coles Cashew ButterColes
vs
Lotus Biscoff Crunchy Spread
Lotus Biscoff Crunchy SpreadLotus Biscoff
Protein (higher)
19.4 vs 3.2 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
19.4 vs 58.8 g
sugars (lower)
5.4 vs 36.2 g
Sodium (lower)
6 vs 240 mg
Fat, total (lower)
35.7 vs 44.4 g
saturated (lower)
7.9 vs 9 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueColesLotus Biscoff
Energy2400 kJ (574 Cal)2380 kJ (569 Cal)
Protein19.4 g3.2 g
Fat, total44.4 g35.7 g
- saturated9 g7.9 g
- monounsaturated27.2 g-
- polyunsaturated8.1 g-
- trans0.1 g-
Carbohydrate19.4 g58.8 g
- sugars5.4 g36.2 g
Dietary fibre12.2 g-
Sodium6 mg240 mg
Potassium540 mg-

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each jar

Coles: see pack
Lotus Biscoff: Ingredients: Caramelised biscuits (65%) (Wheat flour, sugar, vegetable oils (palm oil, canola oil), candy sugar syrup, raising agent (sodium carbonate), soy flo
Browsing Savoury spreads · rankings · finder · what changed