Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › Safcol Wild Caught Tuna In Oil Italian Style 95g vs Sirena Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g
Safcol Wild Caught Tuna In Oil Italian Style 95g vs Sirena Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g
Per 100 g, Sirena Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g has more tuna (70.1% vs 70%), less saturated fat (0.5 vs 1.4) than Safcol Wild Caught Tuna In Oil Italian Style 95g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
monounsaturated (higher)
3.9 vs 1 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
5.7 vs 2.1 g
Sodium (lower)
352 vs 484 mg
Sirena Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g leads on
Energy (lower)
610 vs 837 kJ
Fat, total (lower)
3.8 vs 12.8 g
saturated (lower)
0.5 vs 1.4 g
trans (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
More tuna
70.1% vs 70%
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Safcol | Sirena |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 837 kJ (200 Cal) | 610 kJ (146 Cal) |
| Protein | 20.8 g | 20.6 g |
| Fat, total | 12.8 g | 3.8 g |
| - saturated | 1.4 g | 0.5 g |
| - monounsaturated | 3.9 g | 1 g |
| - polyunsaturated | 5.7 g | 2.1 g |
| - trans | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | - | 7.3 g |
| - sugars | - | 7.3 g |
| Sodium | 352 mg | 484 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
Safcol: see pack
70% tuna
Sirena: POLE & LINE CAUGHT YELLOWFIN TUNA (FISH) (70.1%), SUGAR, SUNFLOWER OIL, VINEGAR, CHILLI (4.3%), ONION, GINGER, SEA SALT, WATER, NATURAL XANTHAN GUM, NATURAL COL
70.1% tuna