Cals
CalsCanned tunaCompareSafcol Salmon With Mild Red Chilli Pouch 100g vs Sirena Tuna With Beans Mexican 170g

Safcol Salmon With Mild Red Chilli Pouch 100g vs Sirena Tuna With Beans Mexican 170g

Per 100 g, Sirena Tuna With Beans Mexican 170g has less sugar (1.2 vs 2.5), less sodium (590 vs 650), less saturated fat (1.3 vs 2.1) than Safcol Salmon With Mild Red Chilli Pouch 100g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Safcol Salmon With Mild Red Chilli Pouch 100g
Safcol Salmon With Mild Red Chilli Pouch 100gSafcol
vs
Sirena Tuna With Beans Mexican 170g
Sirena Tuna With Beans Mexican 170gSirena
Protein (higher)
17 vs 12.5 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
6.6 vs 4.3 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
2.7 vs 8.8 g
Fat, total (lower)
9.8 vs 11.5 g
saturated (lower)
1.3 vs 2.1 g
sugars (lower)
1.2 vs 2.5 g
Sodium (lower)
590 vs 650 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueSafcolSirena
Energy760 kJ (182 Cal)765 kJ (183 Cal)
Protein17 g12.5 g
Fat, total11.5 g9.8 g
- saturated2.1 g1.3 g
- monounsaturated2.8 g3 g
- polyunsaturated6.6 g4.3 g
- trans0.1 g0.1 g
Carbohydrate2.7 g8.8 g
- sugars2.5 g1.2 g
Dietary fibre-4.5 g
Sodium650 mg590 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

Safcol: Premium Salmon (70%), Springwater, Soybean Oil, Su gar, Salt, Chilli (1%), Colour (160c).
Sirena: POLE AND LINE CAUGHT YELLOWFIN TUNA (FISH) (25%), SOYBEAN (15%), CHICKPEA (13%), RED KIDNEY BEAN (12%), OIL (SUNFLOWER OIL AND EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL), BARLEY (
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed