Cals
Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › Safcol Red Salmon 210g vs Sirena Tuna Pesto 95g

Safcol Red Salmon 210g vs Sirena Tuna Pesto 95g

Per 100 g, Safcol Red Salmon 210g and Sirena Tuna Pesto 95g are compositionally close.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Safcol Red Salmon 210g
Safcol Red Salmon 210gSafcol
vs
Sirena Tuna Pesto 95g
Sirena Tuna Pesto 95gSirena
Carbohydrate (lower)
0.2 vs 0.8 g
monounsaturated (higher)
7.6 vs 3.2 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
8.7 vs 2.6 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueSafcolSirena
Energy-1137 kJ (272 Cal)
Protein-23.2 g
Fat, total-19.3 g
- saturated-2.7 g
- monounsaturated3.2 g7.6 g
- polyunsaturated2.6 g8.7 g
- trans0.1 g0.1 g
Carbohydrate0.2 g0.8 g
- sugars0.2 g0.4 g
Sodium-426 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

Safcol: RED SALMON (99%) (Fish), SALT.
Sirena: POLE & LINE CAUGHT YELLOWFIN TUNA (FISH) (66.0%), SUNFLOWER SEED OIL (24.0%), BASIL (2.5%), CASHEW NUT (2.0%), GARLIC, PARSLEY, SEA SALT, LEMON JUICE CONCENTRAT
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed