Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › John West Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g vs Safcol Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g
John West Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g vs Safcol Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g
Per 100 g, John West Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g has less sodium (365 vs 382), more protein (23 vs 20.7) than Safcol Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Protein (higher)
23 vs 20.7 g
Fat, total (lower)
5.3 vs 6.2 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
2.2 vs 1.9 g
Safcol Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g leads on
monounsaturated (higher)
2.2 vs 1.7 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | John West | Safcol |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 586 kJ (140 Cal) | 579 kJ (138 Cal) |
| Protein | 23 g | 20.7 g |
| Fat, total | 5.3 g | 6.2 g |
| - saturated | 1.6 g | 1.4 g |
| - monounsaturated | 1.7 g | 2.2 g |
| - polyunsaturated | 2.2 g | 1.9 g |
| - trans | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 1 g | 1 g |
| - sugars | 1 g | 1 g |
| Sodium | 365 mg | 382 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
John West: Salmon (*fish*), salt.
Safcol: PINK SALMON (Fish) (99%), SALT.