Cals
CalsCanned tunaCompareJohn West Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g vs Safcol Salmon Tomato & Onion 95g

John West Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g vs Safcol Salmon Tomato & Onion 95g

Per 100 g, John West Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g has less sugar (1 vs 4.4), less sodium (365 vs 455), more protein (23 vs 16.8) than Safcol Salmon Tomato & Onion 95g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

John West Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g
John West Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415gJohn West
vs
Safcol Salmon Tomato & Onion 95g
Safcol Salmon Tomato & Onion 95gSafcol
Protein (higher)
23 vs 16.8 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
1 vs 6 g
sugars (lower)
1 vs 4.4 g
Sodium (lower)
365 vs 455 mg
saturated (lower)
0.75 vs 1.6 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
2.56 vs 2.2 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueJohn WestSafcol
Energy586 kJ (140 Cal)584 kJ (140 Cal)
Protein23 g16.8 g
Fat, total5.3 g5.4 g
- saturated1.6 g0.75 g
- monounsaturated1.7 g1.51 g
- polyunsaturated2.2 g2.56 g
- trans0.2 g0.13 g
Carbohydrate1 g6 g
- sugars1 g4.4 g
Sodium365 mg455 mg
Potassium-260 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

John West: Salmon (*fish*), salt.
Safcol: Premium Salmon (46%), Tomato Sauce (32%) ( Water, Vinegar, Sugar, Sunflower Oil, Salt, Tomato Paste (1%), Vegetable Broth (Peas & Carrots), paprika oleoresins (
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed