Cals
CalsCanned tunaCompareBrunswick Original Kipper 100g vs Safcol Salmon With Mild Red Chilli Pouch 100g

Brunswick Original Kipper 100g vs Safcol Salmon With Mild Red Chilli Pouch 100g

Per 100 g, Brunswick Original Kipper 100g has less sugar (0 vs 2.5), less sodium (377 vs 650), more protein (18.5 vs 17) than Safcol Salmon With Mild Red Chilli Pouch 100g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Brunswick Original Kipper 100g
Brunswick Original Kipper 100gBrunswick
vs
Safcol Salmon With Mild Red Chilli Pouch 100g
Safcol Salmon With Mild Red Chilli Pouch 100gSafcol
Protein (higher)
18.5 vs 17 g
monounsaturated (higher)
6.5 vs 2.8 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
0 vs 2.7 g
sugars (lower)
0 vs 2.5 g
Sodium (lower)
377 vs 650 mg
Energy (lower)
760 vs 777 kJ
Fat, total (lower)
11.5 vs 12.5 g
saturated (lower)
2.1 vs 2.9 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
6.6 vs 2.8 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueBrunswickSafcol
Energy777 kJ (186 Cal)760 kJ (182 Cal)
Protein18.5 g17 g
Fat, total12.5 g11.5 g
- saturated2.9 g2.1 g
- monounsaturated6.5 g2.8 g
- polyunsaturated2.8 g6.6 g
- trans0 g0.1 g
Carbohydrate0 g2.7 g
- sugars0 g2.5 g
Sodium377 mg650 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

Brunswick: see pack
Safcol: Premium Salmon (70%), Springwater, Soybean Oil, Su gar, Salt, Chilli (1%), Colour (160c).
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed