Hormel SPAM 3 x 340g Cans vs Spam Ham Low Salt 340g
Per 100 g, Spam Ham Low Salt 340g has less sugar (1.3 vs 1.8), less sodium (750 vs 1000), less saturated fat (10 vs 11) than Hormel SPAM 3 x 340g Cans.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Hormel SPAM 3 x 340g Cans leads on
Carbohydrate (lower)
2 vs 3 g
Spam Ham Low Salt 340g leads on
Protein (higher)
13.2 vs 12 g
saturated (lower)
10 vs 11 g
sugars (lower)
1.3 vs 1.8 g
Sodium (lower)
750 vs 1000 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Spam | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1311 kJ (313 Cal) | 1320 kJ (315 Cal) |
| Protein | 12 g | 13.2 g |
| Fat, total | 29 g | 28.3 g |
| - saturated | 11 g | 10 g |
| Carbohydrate | 2 g | 3 g |
| - sugars | 1.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Sodium | 1000 mg | 750 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each can
: see pack
Spam: see pack