Hormel SPAM 3 x 340g Cans vs Spam Ham Lite 340g
Per 100 g, Spam Ham Lite 340g has less sugar (1.4 vs 1.8), less sodium (741 vs 1000), less saturated fat (5 vs 11) than Hormel SPAM 3 x 340g Cans.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Hormel SPAM 3 x 340g Cans leads on
Carbohydrate (lower)
2 vs 3 g
Spam Ham Lite 340g leads on
Energy (lower)
773 vs 1311 kJ
Fat, total (lower)
13.8 vs 29 g
saturated (lower)
5 vs 11 g
sugars (lower)
1.4 vs 1.8 g
Sodium (lower)
741 vs 1000 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Spam | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1311 kJ (313 Cal) | 773 kJ (185 Cal) |
| Protein | 12 g | 12.5 g |
| Fat, total | 29 g | 13.8 g |
| - saturated | 11 g | 5 g |
| Carbohydrate | 2 g | 3 g |
| - sugars | 1.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Sodium | 1000 mg | 741 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each can
: see pack
Spam: see pack