Cals
CalsBakingCompareLo-fo Pantry Low Fodmap Plain Flour vs McKenzie's Tapioca Flour 300g

Lo-fo Pantry Low Fodmap Plain Flour vs McKenzie's Tapioca Flour 300g

Per 100 g, Lo-fo Pantry Low Fodmap Plain Flour has less sugar (0.25 vs 1), less saturated fat (0 vs 1), more protein (15.9 vs 1) than McKenzie's Tapioca Flour 300g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Lo-fo Pantry Low Fodmap Plain Flour
Lo-fo Pantry Low Fodmap Plain FlourLo-fo Pantry
vs
McKenzie's Tapioca Flour 300g
McKenzie's Tapioca Flour 300gMcKenzie's
Protein (higher)
15.9 vs 1 g
saturated (lower)
0 vs 1 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
70.3 vs 86.7 g
sugars (lower)
0.25 vs 1 g
Sodium (lower)
15 vs 37 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueLo-fo PantryMcKenzie's
Energy1540 kJ (368 Cal)1530 kJ (366 Cal)
Protein15.9 g1 g
Fat, total1.6 g1.6 g
- saturated0 g1 g
Carbohydrate70.3 g86.7 g
- sugars0.25 g1 g
Dietary fibre-1 g
Sodium37 mg15 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each pack

Lo-fo Pantry: see pack
McKenzie's: Tapioca flour, processing aid (sulphites).
Browsing Baking · rankings · finder · what changed