Cals
Cals › Baking › Compare › Coles Organic Self Raising Flour vs McKenzie's Tapioca Flour 300g

Coles Organic Self Raising Flour vs McKenzie's Tapioca Flour 300g

Per 100 g, Coles Organic Self Raising Flour has less saturated fat (0.3 vs 1), more protein (9.3 vs 1) than McKenzie's Tapioca Flour 300g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Coles Organic Self Raising Flour
Coles Organic Self Raising FlourColes Organic
vs
McKenzie's Tapioca Flour 300g
McKenzie's Tapioca Flour 300gMcKenzie's
Protein (higher)
9.3 vs 1 g
Fat, total (lower)
1.3 vs 1.6 g
saturated (lower)
0.3 vs 1 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
76.2 vs 86.7 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
3.2 vs 1 g
sugars (lower)
1 vs 3 g
Sodium (lower)
15 vs 320 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueColes OrganicMcKenzie's
Energy1530 kJ (366 Cal)1530 kJ (366 Cal)
Protein9.3 g1 g
Fat, total1.3 g1.6 g
- saturated0.3 g1 g
Carbohydrate76.2 g86.7 g
- sugars3 g1 g
Dietary fibre3.2 g1 g
Sodium320 mg15 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each pack

Coles Organic: see pack
McKenzie's: Tapioca flour, processing aid (sulphites).
Browsing Baking · rankings · finder · what changed