Cals
CalsSweet spreadsCompareColes Caramelised Biscuit Spread Smooth vs Lotus Biscoff Crunchy Spread

Coles Caramelised Biscuit Spread Smooth vs Lotus Biscoff Crunchy Spread

Per 100 g, Coles Caramelised Biscuit Spread Smooth has less sugar (31.2 vs 36.2), less sodium (160 vs 240), less saturated fat (7.2 vs 7.9) than Lotus Biscoff Crunchy Spread.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Coles Caramelised Biscuit Spread Smooth
Coles Caramelised Biscuit Spread SmoothColes
vs
Lotus Biscoff Crunchy Spread
Lotus Biscoff Crunchy SpreadLotus Biscoff
saturated (lower)
7.2 vs 7.9 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
55.2 vs 58.8 g
sugars (lower)
31.2 vs 36.2 g
Sodium (lower)
160 vs 240 mg
Energy (lower)
2380 vs 2450 kJ
Fat, total (lower)
35.7 vs 39.2 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueColesLotus Biscoff
Energy2450 kJ (586 Cal)2380 kJ (569 Cal)
Protein3.3 g3.2 g
Fat, total39.2 g35.7 g
- saturated7.2 g7.9 g
Carbohydrate55.2 g58.8 g
- sugars31.2 g36.2 g
Dietary fibre1.2 g-
Sodium160 mg240 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each jar

Coles: see pack
Lotus Biscoff: see pack
Browsing Sweet spreads · rankings · finder · what changed