Cals › Sweet spreads › Compare › Coles Caramelised Biscuit Spread Crunchy vs Lotus Biscoff Crunchy Spread
Coles Caramelised Biscuit Spread Crunchy vs Lotus Biscoff Crunchy Spread
Per 100 g, Coles Caramelised Biscuit Spread Crunchy has less sugar (29.3 vs 36.2), less sodium (180 vs 240), less saturated fat (7.3 vs 7.9) than Lotus Biscoff Crunchy Spread.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Protein (higher)
3.5 vs 3.2 g
saturated (lower)
7.3 vs 7.9 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
54.4 vs 58.8 g
sugars (lower)
29.3 vs 36.2 g
Sodium (lower)
180 vs 240 mg
Lotus Biscoff Crunchy Spread leads on
no measured leads
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Coles | Lotus Biscoff |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 2380 kJ (569 Cal) | 2380 kJ (569 Cal) |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3.2 g |
| Fat, total | 37.4 g | 35.7 g |
| - saturated | 7.3 g | 7.9 g |
| Carbohydrate | 54.4 g | 58.8 g |
| - sugars | 29.3 g | 36.2 g |
| Dietary fibre | 1.3 g | - |
| Sodium | 180 mg | 240 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each jar
Coles: see pack
Lotus Biscoff: see pack