Cals › Sweet spreads › Compare › Beerenberg Australian Orange Marmalade vs Bonne Maman Plum Conserve 370g
Beerenberg Australian Orange Marmalade vs Bonne Maman Plum Conserve 370g
Per 100 g, Bonne Maman Plum Conserve 370g has less sugar (64 vs 66), less sodium (0 vs 5), less saturated fat (0 vs 1) than Beerenberg Australian Orange Marmalade.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Protein (higher)
1 vs 0.4 g
Bonne Maman Plum Conserve 370g leads on
Energy (lower)
1108 vs 1140 kJ
Fat, total (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
saturated (lower)
0 vs 1 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
64 vs 68 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Beerenberg | Bonne Maman |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1140 kJ (272 Cal) | 1108 kJ (265 Cal) |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.4 g |
| Fat, total | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| - saturated | 1 g | 0 g |
| Carbohydrate | 68 g | 64 g |
| - sugars | 66 g | 64 g |
| Sodium | 5 mg | 0 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each jar
Beerenberg: see pack
Bonne Maman: Damson plums (50%), sugar, brown cane sugar, concentrated lemon juice, gelling agent (fruit pectins)
50% fruit