Cals › Rolls, bagels & wraps › Compare › Coles Stone Baked By Laurent Mini Sub Rolls vs Warburtons Gluten Free Soft Sliced Brioche Style Rolls 4 Pack
Coles Stone Baked By Laurent Mini Sub Rolls vs Warburtons Gluten Free Soft Sliced Brioche Style Rolls 4 Pack
Per 100 g, Coles Stone Baked By Laurent Mini Sub Rolls has less sugar (3.12 vs 7.5), less saturated fat (0.23 vs 0.7), more protein (9.36 vs 6.1) than Warburtons Gluten Free Soft Sliced Brioche Style Rolls 4 Pack.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Coles Stone Baked By Laurent Mini Sub RollsColes
vs
Warburtons Gluten Free Soft Sliced Brioche Style Rolls 4 PackWarburtons
Energy (lower)
1030 vs 1058 kJ
Protein (higher)
9.36 vs 6.1 g
Fat, total (lower)
0.9 vs 8.4 g
saturated (lower)
0.23 vs 0.7 g
sugars (lower)
3.12 vs 7.5 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
36.4 vs 47.9 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
3 vs 2.3 g
Sodium (lower)
320 vs 442 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Coles | Warburtons |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1030 kJ (246 Cal) | 1058 kJ (253 Cal) |
| Protein | 9.36 g | 6.1 g |
| Fat, total | 0.9 g | 8.4 g |
| - saturated | 0.23 g | 0.7 g |
| Carbohydrate | 47.9 g | 36.4 g |
| - sugars | 3.12 g | 7.5 g |
| Dietary fibre | 2.3 g | 3 g |
| Sodium | 442 mg | 320 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each pack
Coles: see pack
Warburtons: see pack