Cals › Protein bars › Compare › Clif Bar Crunchy Peanut Butter 68g vs Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 High Protein Low Sugar Bar Choc Mint 38g
Clif Bar Crunchy Peanut Butter 68g vs Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 High Protein Low Sugar Bar Choc Mint 38g
Per 100 g, Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 High Protein Low Sugar Bar Choc Mint 38g has less sugar (4.9 vs 29), less sodium (304 vs 338), more protein (27.1 vs 16) than Clif Bar Crunchy Peanut Butter 68g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Clif Bar Crunchy Peanut Butter 68gClif Bar
vs
Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 High Protein Low Sugar Bar Choc Mint 38gSarah Di Lorenzo 10:10
Clif Bar Crunchy Peanut Butter 68g leads on
Fat, total (lower)
10 vs 17.1 g
saturated (lower)
1 vs 11.9 g
Protein (higher)
27.1 vs 16 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
16.2 vs 60 g
sugars (lower)
4.9 vs 29 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
17 vs 6 g
Sodium (lower)
304 vs 338 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Clif Bar | Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10 |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1600 kJ (382 Cal) | 1580 kJ (378 Cal) |
| Protein | 16 g | 27.1 g |
| Fat, total | 10 g | 17.1 g |
| - saturated | 1 g | 11.9 g |
| - monounsaturated | 2.89 g | - |
| - polyunsaturated | 2.57 g | - |
| - trans | 0.03 g | - |
| Carbohydrate | 60 g | 16.2 g |
| - sugars | 29 g | 4.9 g |
| Dietary fibre | 6 g | 17 g |
| Sodium | 338 mg | 304 mg |
| Potassium | 338 mg | - |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each bar
Clif Bar: see pack
Sarah Di Lorenzo 10:10: see pack