Cals › Protein bars › Compare › BSc Soft Protein Bar Banana Chocolate vs Clif Bar Energy White Chocolate Macadamia Bar 68g
BSc Soft Protein Bar Banana Chocolate vs Clif Bar Energy White Chocolate Macadamia Bar 68g
Per 100 g, BSc Soft Protein Bar Banana Chocolate has less sugar (3.1 vs 25.5), less sodium (276 vs 342), more protein (29.2 vs 14.5) than Clif Bar Energy White Chocolate Macadamia Bar 68g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
BSc Soft Protein Bar Banana ChocolateBSc
vs
Clif Bar Energy White Chocolate Macadamia Bar 68gClif Bar
Protein (higher)
29.2 vs 14.5 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
8.7 vs 54.3 g
sugars (lower)
3.1 vs 25.5 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
12.3 vs 7.4 g
Sodium (lower)
276 vs 342 mg
Fat, total (lower)
11 vs 16.2 g
saturated (lower)
2.1 vs 10.7 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | BSc | Clif Bar |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1630 kJ (390 Cal) | 1640 kJ (392 Cal) |
| Protein | 29.2 g | 14.5 g |
| Fat, total | 16.2 g | 11 g |
| - saturated | 10.7 g | 2.1 g |
| - monounsaturated | - | 2.89 g |
| - polyunsaturated | - | 2.57 g |
| - trans | - | 0.03 g |
| Carbohydrate | 8.7 g | 54.3 g |
| - sugars | 3.1 g | 25.5 g |
| Dietary fibre | 12.3 g | 7.4 g |
| Sodium | 276 mg | 342 mg |
| Potassium | - | 336 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each bar
BSc: see pack
Clif Bar: see pack