Cals › Pasta › Compare › Cucina Matese Penne Rigate No.118 Italian Pasta vs Zafarelli Elicoidali Pasta No 57
Cucina Matese Penne Rigate No.118 Italian Pasta vs Zafarelli Elicoidali Pasta No 57
Per 100 g, Cucina Matese Penne Rigate No.118 Italian Pasta has less sodium (8 vs 30), less saturated fat (0.3 vs 0.5), more protein (14 vs 11.5) than Zafarelli Elicoidali Pasta No 57.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Cucina Matese Penne Rigate No.118 Italian PastaCucina Matese
vs
Zafarelli Elicoidali Pasta No 57Zafarelli
Protein (higher)
14 vs 11.5 g
Fat, total (lower)
1.5 vs 2 g
Sodium (lower)
8 vs 30 mg
Zafarelli Elicoidali Pasta No 57 leads on
sugars (lower)
2.5 vs 4.1 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
4 vs 3.3 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Cucina Matese | Zafarelli |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1510 kJ (361 Cal) | 1510 kJ (361 Cal) |
| Protein | 14 g | 11.5 g |
| Fat, total | 1.5 g | 2 g |
| - saturated | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Carbohydrate | 70 g | 71 g |
| - sugars | 4.1 g | 2.5 g |
| Dietary fibre | 3.3 g | 4 g |
| Sodium | 8 mg | 30 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each pack
Cucina Matese: see pack
Zafarelli: see pack