Cals › Pasta › Compare › Cucina Matese Fusilli No.114 Italian Pasta vs Zafarelli Liscio Piccolo Pasta No 40 500g
Cucina Matese Fusilli No.114 Italian Pasta vs Zafarelli Liscio Piccolo Pasta No 40 500g
Per 100 g, Cucina Matese Fusilli No.114 Italian Pasta has less sodium (8 vs 30), less saturated fat (0.3 vs 0.5), more protein (14 vs 11.5) than Zafarelli Liscio Piccolo Pasta No 40 500g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Cucina Matese Fusilli No.114 Italian PastaCucina Matese
vs
Zafarelli Liscio Piccolo Pasta No 40 500gZafarelli
Protein (higher)
14 vs 11.5 g
Fat, total (lower)
1.5 vs 2 g
Sodium (lower)
8 vs 30 mg
sugars (lower)
2.5 vs 4 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
4 vs 3.3 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Cucina Matese | Zafarelli |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1510 kJ (361 Cal) | 1510 kJ (361 Cal) |
| Protein | 14 g | 11.5 g |
| Fat, total | 1.5 g | 2 g |
| - saturated | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Carbohydrate | 70 g | 71 g |
| - sugars | 4 g | 2.5 g |
| Dietary fibre | 3.3 g | 4 g |
| Sodium | 8 mg | 30 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each pack
Cucina Matese: see pack
Zafarelli: Durum Wheat Semolina.