Cals › Pasta › Compare › ARMANDO Fusilli Spirals 500g vs Street Kitchen Stirfry Noodle Kit Chinese Hoisin & Garlic
ARMANDO Fusilli Spirals 500g vs Street Kitchen Stirfry Noodle Kit Chinese Hoisin & Garlic
Per 100 g, ARMANDO Fusilli Spirals 500g has less sugar (0.5 vs 12.5), less sodium (5 vs 696), more protein (7.1 vs 3.6) than Street Kitchen Stirfry Noodle Kit Chinese Hoisin & Garlic.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
ARMANDO Fusilli Spirals 500gARMANDO
vs
Street Kitchen Stirfry Noodle Kit Chinese Hoisin & GarlicStreet Kitchen
ARMANDO Fusilli Spirals 500g leads on
Protein (higher)
7.1 vs 3.6 g
sugars (lower)
0.5 vs 12.5 g
Sodium (lower)
5 vs 696 mg
Energy (lower)
694 vs 774 kJ
Fat, total (lower)
0.5 vs 0.8 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | ARMANDO | Street Kitchen |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 774 kJ (185 Cal) | 694 kJ (166 Cal) |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 3.6 g |
| Fat, total | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| - saturated | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 35.9 g | 35.4 g |
| - sugars | 0.5 g | 12.5 g |
| Dietary fibre | 1.7 g | - |
| Sodium | 5 mg | 696 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each pack
ARMANDO: see pack
Street Kitchen: see pack