Cals
CalsFish fingers & nuggetsCompareREADY, SET…COOK! Crumbed Chicken Tenders Buffalo Style 400g vs Steggles Wholemeal & Quinoa Chicken Tenderloins 1.5kg

READY, SET…COOK! Crumbed Chicken Tenders Buffalo Style 400g vs Steggles Wholemeal & Quinoa Chicken Tenderloins 1.5kg

Per 100 g, Steggles Wholemeal & Quinoa Chicken Tenderloins 1.5kg has less sodium (168 vs 433), more protein (18.5 vs 15.7) than READY, SET…COOK! Crumbed Chicken Tenders Buffalo Style 400g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

READY, SET…COOK! Crumbed Chicken Tenders Buffalo Style 400g
READY, SET…COOK! Crumbed Chicken Tenders Buffalo Style 400gREADY, SET…COOK!
vs
Steggles Wholemeal & Quinoa Chicken Tenderloins 1.5kg
Steggles Wholemeal & Quinoa Chicken Tenderloins 1.5kg
sugars (lower)
2.3 vs 3.2 g
Energy (lower)
676 vs 706 kJ
Protein (higher)
18.5 vs 15.7 g
Fat, total (lower)
6.4 vs 7.3 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
6.3 vs 9.4 g
Sodium (lower)
168 vs 433 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueREADY, SET…COOK!
Energy706 kJ (169 Cal)676 kJ (162 Cal)
Protein15.7 g18.5 g
Fat, total7.3 g6.4 g
- saturated0.8 g1 g
Carbohydrate9.4 g6.3 g
- sugars2.3 g3.2 g
Sodium433 mg168 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each box

READY, SET…COOK!: see pack
: see pack
Browsing Fish fingers & nuggets · rankings · finder · what changed