Cals › Fish fingers & nuggets › Compare › Fropro Fpfc Sweet Chilli Tenders vs Steggles Wholemeal & Quinoa Chicken Tenderloins 1.5kg
Fropro Fpfc Sweet Chilli Tenders vs Steggles Wholemeal & Quinoa Chicken Tenderloins 1.5kg
Per 100 g, Fropro Fpfc Sweet Chilli Tenders has less sugar (1.6 vs 3.2), less saturated fat (0.7 vs 1), more protein (21.8 vs 18.5) than Steggles Wholemeal & Quinoa Chicken Tenderloins 1.5kg.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Fropro Fpfc Sweet Chilli Tenders leads on
Protein (higher)
21.8 vs 18.5 g
Fat, total (lower)
4 vs 6.4 g
saturated (lower)
0.7 vs 1 g
sugars (lower)
1.6 vs 3.2 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
6.3 vs 8.8 g
Sodium (lower)
168 vs 205 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Fropro | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 680 kJ (163 Cal) | 676 kJ (162 Cal) |
| Protein | 21.8 g | 18.5 g |
| Fat, total | 4 g | 6.4 g |
| - saturated | 0.7 g | 1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 8.8 g | 6.3 g |
| - sugars | 1.6 g | 3.2 g |
| Dietary fibre | 1.3 g | - |
| Sodium | 205 mg | 168 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each box
Fropro: see pack
: see pack