Cals › Fish fingers & nuggets › Compare › Fropro Fpfc Sweet Chilli Tenders vs READY, SET…COOK! Crumbed Chicken Tenders Buffalo Style 400g
Fropro Fpfc Sweet Chilli Tenders vs READY, SET…COOK! Crumbed Chicken Tenders Buffalo Style 400g
Per 100 g, Fropro Fpfc Sweet Chilli Tenders has less sugar (1.6 vs 2.3), less sodium (205 vs 433), less saturated fat (0.7 vs 0.8) than READY, SET…COOK! Crumbed Chicken Tenders Buffalo Style 400g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Fropro Fpfc Sweet Chilli TendersFropro
vs
READY, SET…COOK! Crumbed Chicken Tenders Buffalo Style 400gREADY, SET…COOK!
Fropro Fpfc Sweet Chilli Tenders leads on
Energy (lower)
680 vs 706 kJ
Protein (higher)
21.8 vs 15.7 g
Fat, total (lower)
4 vs 7.3 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
8.8 vs 9.4 g
sugars (lower)
1.6 vs 2.3 g
Sodium (lower)
205 vs 433 mg
no measured leads
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Fropro | READY, SET…COOK! |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 680 kJ (163 Cal) | 706 kJ (169 Cal) |
| Protein | 21.8 g | 15.7 g |
| Fat, total | 4 g | 7.3 g |
| - saturated | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Carbohydrate | 8.8 g | 9.4 g |
| - sugars | 1.6 g | 2.3 g |
| Dietary fibre | 1.3 g | - |
| Sodium | 205 mg | 433 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each box
Fropro: see pack
READY, SET…COOK!: see pack