Cals › Fish fingers & nuggets › Compare › Coles Frozen Buttermilk Chicken Tenders vs READY, SET…COOK! Crumbed Chicken Tenders Buffalo Style 400g
Coles Frozen Buttermilk Chicken Tenders vs READY, SET…COOK! Crumbed Chicken Tenders Buffalo Style 400g
Per 100 g, READY, SET…COOK! Crumbed Chicken Tenders Buffalo Style 400g has less saturated fat (0.8 vs 1.3), more protein (15.7 vs 12.2) than Coles Frozen Buttermilk Chicken Tenders.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Coles Frozen Buttermilk Chicken TendersColes
vs
READY, SET…COOK! Crumbed Chicken Tenders Buffalo Style 400gREADY, SET…COOK!
sugars (lower)
0.1 vs 2.3 g
Sodium (lower)
320 vs 433 mg
Energy (lower)
706 vs 721 kJ
Protein (higher)
15.7 vs 12.2 g
Fat, total (lower)
7.3 vs 9.4 g
saturated (lower)
0.8 vs 1.3 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Coles | READY, SET…COOK! |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 721 kJ (172 Cal) | 706 kJ (169 Cal) |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 15.7 g |
| Fat, total | 9.4 g | 7.3 g |
| - saturated | 1.3 g | 0.8 g |
| - trans | 0.01 g | - |
| Carbohydrate | 9.1 g | 9.4 g |
| - sugars | 0.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Dietary fibre | 1.4 g | - |
| Sodium | 320 mg | 433 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each box
Coles: see pack
READY, SET…COOK!: see pack