Cals
CalsChipsCompareBurger Rings Tangy Snacks Party Bag 220g vs Pringles Salt & Vinegar Flavour Potato Chips 134g

Burger Rings Tangy Snacks Party Bag 220g vs Pringles Salt & Vinegar Flavour Potato Chips 134g

Per 100 g, Burger Rings Tangy Snacks Party Bag 220g has less saturated fat (2 vs 12.6), more protein (6.8 vs 4.2) than Pringles Salt & Vinegar Flavour Potato Chips 134g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Burger Rings Tangy Snacks Party Bag 220g
Burger Rings Tangy Snacks Party Bag 220gBurger Rings
vs
Pringles Salt & Vinegar Flavour Potato Chips 134g
Pringles Salt & Vinegar Flavour Potato Chips 134gPringles
Protein (higher)
6.8 vs 4.2 g
Fat, total (lower)
25.1 vs 28.1 g
saturated (lower)
2 vs 12.6 g
Dietary fibre (higher)
3.5 vs 2.8 g
sugars (lower)
0.6 vs 2.6 g
Sodium (lower)
645 vs 959 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueBurger RingsPringles
Energy2120 kJ (507 Cal)2120 kJ (507 Cal)
Protein6.8 g4.2 g
Fat, total25.1 g28.1 g
- saturated2 g12.6 g
- monounsaturated14.6 g-
- polyunsaturated7.7 g-
- trans0.2 g-
Carbohydrate-57.8 g
- sugars2.6 g0.6 g
Dietary fibre3.5 g2.8 g
Sodium959 mg645 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each pack

Burger Rings: Cereals (Corn, Rice), Canola Oil Maltodextrin, Rice Bran, Salt, Sugar, Hydrolysed Vegetable Protein (Soy), Flavour Enhancer (621), Food Acids (Sodium Diacetate,
Pringles: Dehydrated potato, vegetable oils, wheat starch (gluten), rice flour, maltodextrin, flavours, emulsifier (471), salt, mineral salt (508), sugar, flavour enhance
Browsing Chips · rankings · finder · what changed