Cals › Chips › Compare › Burger Rings Tangy Snacks 90g vs Pringles Salt & Vinegar Flavour Potato Chips 134g
Burger Rings Tangy Snacks 90g vs Pringles Salt & Vinegar Flavour Potato Chips 134g
Per 100 g, Burger Rings Tangy Snacks 90g has less saturated fat (2 vs 12.6), more protein (6.8 vs 4.2) than Pringles Salt & Vinegar Flavour Potato Chips 134g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Burger Rings Tangy Snacks 90gBurger Rings
vs
Pringles Salt & Vinegar Flavour Potato Chips 134gPringles
Burger Rings Tangy Snacks 90g leads on
Protein (higher)
6.8 vs 4.2 g
Fat, total (lower)
25.1 vs 28.1 g
saturated (lower)
2 vs 12.6 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
57.8 vs 62.7 g
sugars (lower)
0.6 vs 2.6 g
Sodium (lower)
645 vs 959 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Burger Rings | Pringles |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 2120 kJ (507 Cal) | 2120 kJ (507 Cal) |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 4.2 g |
| Fat, total | 25.1 g | 28.1 g |
| - saturated | 2 g | 12.6 g |
| Carbohydrate | 62.7 g | 57.8 g |
| - sugars | 2.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Dietary fibre | - | 2.8 g |
| Sodium | 959 mg | 645 mg |
| Potassium | 238 mg | - |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each pack
Burger Rings: Cereals (Corn, Rice), Canola Oil, Maltodextrin, Ri,ce Bran, Salt, Sugar, Hydrolysed Vegetable Protei n,(Soy), Flavour Enhancer (621), Food Acids (Sodiu m,Diacet
Pringles: Dehydrated potato, vegetable oils, wheat starch (gluten), rice flour, maltodextrin, flavours, emulsifier (471), salt, mineral salt (508), sugar, flavour enhance