Cals
CalsCanned tunaCompareSafcol Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g vs Sirena Tuna In Lite Italian Style Oil 425g

Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g vs Sirena Tuna In Lite Italian Style Oil 425g

Per 100 g, Sirena Tuna In Lite Italian Style Oil 425g has less sugar (0.1 vs 5.7), more protein (26 vs 16.6) than Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g
Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g50% tuna
vs
Sirena Tuna In Lite Italian Style Oil 425g
Sirena Tuna In Lite Italian Style Oil 425gSirena
polyunsaturated (higher)
2.5 vs 1 g
Sodium (lower)
400 vs 519 mg
Energy (lower)
529 vs 540 kJ
Protein (higher)
26 vs 16.6 g
Fat, total (lower)
3.3 vs 4.3 g
monounsaturated (higher)
2.6 vs 1.2 g
trans (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
0.1 vs 6 g
sugars (lower)
0.1 vs 5.7 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueSafcolSirena
Energy540 kJ (129 Cal)529 kJ (126 Cal)
Protein16.6 g26 g
Fat, total4.3 g3.3 g
- saturated1 g1 g
- monounsaturated1.2 g2.6 g
- polyunsaturated2.5 g1 g
- trans1 g0.1 g
Carbohydrate6 g0.1 g
- sugars5.7 g0.1 g
Sodium400 mg519 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

Safcol: Skipjack Tuna (Fish) (50%), Sweet Chilli Sauce (35%) (Water, Sunflower Oil, Sugar, Salt, Thickener (Modified Tapioca Starch, Xanthan Gum), Natural Colour (Papri
50% tuna
Sirena: POLE AND LINE YELLOWFIN TUNA (FISH) (71%), WATER, EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL (3.8%), SEA SALT.
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed