Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Springwater 95g vs Sirena Tuna In Springwater 95g
Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Springwater 95g vs Sirena Tuna In Springwater 95g
Per 100 g, Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Springwater 95g has more tuna (75% vs 74%), less sodium (235 vs 397) than Sirena Tuna In Springwater 95g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Energy (lower)
393 vs 458 kJ
Sodium (lower)
235 vs 397 mg
More tuna
75% vs 74%
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Safcol | Sirena |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 393 kJ (94 Cal) | 458 kJ (109 Cal) |
| Protein | 22.3 g | 26 g |
| Fat, total | 1 g | 1 g |
| - saturated | 1 g | 1 g |
| - monounsaturated | 1 g | 1 g |
| - polyunsaturated | 1 g | 1 g |
| - trans | 1 g | 0 g |
| Carbohydrate | 1 g | 1 g |
| - sugars | 1 g | 1 g |
| Sodium | 235 mg | 397 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
Safcol: see pack
75% tuna
Sirena: Pole & Line Caught Yellowfin Tuna (FISH) (73.5%), Springwater (25%), Sea Salt
74% tuna