Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Springwater 95g vs Sirena Tuna In Springwater 425g
Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Springwater 95g vs Sirena Tuna In Springwater 425g
Per 100 g, Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Springwater 95g has less sodium (240 vs 397), more protein (24.3 vs 24) than Sirena Tuna In Springwater 425g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Energy (lower)
430 vs 458 kJ
Sodium (lower)
240 vs 397 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Safcol | Sirena |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 430 kJ (103 Cal) | 458 kJ (109 Cal) |
| Protein | 24.3 g | 24 g |
| Fat, total | 1 g | 1 g |
| - saturated | 1 g | 1 g |
| - monounsaturated | 1 g | 1 g |
| - polyunsaturated | 1 g | 1 g |
| - trans | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 1 g | 1 g |
| - sugars | 1 g | 1 g |
| Sodium | 240 mg | 397 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
Safcol: Skipjack Tuna (Fish) (70%), Springwater (30%).
70% tuna
Sirena: Pole and Line Caught Yellowfin Tuna (FISH) (71%), Springwater (28.5%), Sea Salt
71% tuna