Cals
CalsCanned tunaCompareSafcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g vs Sirena Tuna Soy & Ginger 95g

Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g vs Sirena Tuna Soy & Ginger 95g

Per 100 g, Sirena Tuna Soy & Ginger 95g has more tuna (65% vs 64%), less saturated fat (1.7 vs 3.9), more protein (22.1 vs 13.4) than Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g
Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g64% tuna
vs
Sirena Tuna Soy & Ginger 95g
Sirena Tuna Soy & Ginger 95g65% tuna
monounsaturated (higher)
6.4 vs 4.9 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
14.6 vs 5 g
Sodium (lower)
291 vs 595 mg
Energy (lower)
828 vs 1290 kJ
Protein (higher)
22.1 vs 13.4 g
Fat, total (lower)
12.1 vs 25.1 g
saturated (lower)
1.7 vs 3.9 g
trans (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
1 vs 7.7 g
More tuna
65% vs 64%

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueSafcolSirena
Energy1290 kJ (308 Cal)828 kJ (198 Cal)
Protein13.4 g22.1 g
Fat, total25.1 g12.1 g
- saturated3.9 g1.7 g
- monounsaturated6.4 g4.9 g
- polyunsaturated14.6 g5 g
- trans1 g0.1 g
Carbohydrate7.7 g1 g
- sugars1 g1 g
Sodium291 mg595 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

Safcol: Skipjack Tuna (Fish) (64%), Vegetable Oil (18%), Water, Salt.
64% tuna
Sirena: Pole & Line Caught Yellowfin Tuna (FISH) (65%), Oil (Sunflower Oil & Extra Virgin Olive Oil) (19%), Soy Sauce (Water, Soybeans, Wheat, and salt) (9.5%) Ginger (
65% tuna
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed