Cals
CalsCanned tunaCompareSafcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g vs Sirena Tuna Smoky Chilli 95g

Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g vs Sirena Tuna Smoky Chilli 95g

Per 100 g, Sirena Tuna Smoky Chilli 95g has more tuna (65% vs 64%), less sugar (0 vs 1), less saturated fat (2.4 vs 3.9) than Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g
Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g64% tuna
vs
Sirena Tuna Smoky Chilli 95g
Sirena Tuna Smoky Chilli 95g65% tuna
polyunsaturated (higher)
14.6 vs 12.4 g
Sodium (lower)
291 vs 450 mg
Energy (lower)
1160 vs 1290 kJ
Protein (higher)
18.9 vs 13.4 g
Fat, total (lower)
22.2 vs 25.1 g
saturated (lower)
2.4 vs 3.9 g
trans (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
1 vs 7.7 g
sugars (lower)
0 vs 1 g
More tuna
65% vs 64%

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueSafcolSirena
Energy1290 kJ (308 Cal)1160 kJ (277 Cal)
Protein13.4 g18.9 g
Fat, total25.1 g22.2 g
- saturated3.9 g2.4 g
- monounsaturated6.4 g6.4 g
- polyunsaturated14.6 g12.4 g
- trans1 g0.1 g
Carbohydrate7.7 g1 g
- sugars1 g0 g
Sodium291 mg450 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

Safcol: Skipjack Tuna (Fish) (64%), Vegetable Oil (18%), Water, Salt.
64% tuna
Sirena: POLE & LINE CAUGHT YELLOWFIN TUNA (FISH) (65%), NATURAL SMOKE INFUSED OIL (SUNFLOWER OIL AND NATURAL SMOKE FLAVOUR) (24%), WATER, CHILLI (2%) SEA SALT
65% tuna
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed