Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g vs Sirena Tomato & Onion Tuna In Oil 95g
Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g vs Sirena Tomato & Onion Tuna In Oil 95g
Per 100 g, Sirena Tomato & Onion Tuna In Oil 95g has less saturated fat (0.7 vs 3.9), more protein (21.2 vs 13.4) than Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sandwich 95g leads on
monounsaturated (higher)
6.4 vs 1.4 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
14.6 vs 1.4 g
sugars (lower)
1 vs 2.4 g
Sodium (lower)
291 vs 412 mg
More tuna
64% vs 63.2%
Energy (lower)
577 vs 1290 kJ
Protein (higher)
21.2 vs 13.4 g
Fat, total (lower)
3.9 vs 25.1 g
saturated (lower)
0.7 vs 3.9 g
trans (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
2.9 vs 7.7 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | Safcol | Sirena |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 1290 kJ (308 Cal) | 577 kJ (138 Cal) |
| Protein | 13.4 g | 21.2 g |
| Fat, total | 25.1 g | 3.9 g |
| - saturated | 3.9 g | 0.7 g |
| - monounsaturated | 6.4 g | 1.4 g |
| - polyunsaturated | 14.6 g | 1.4 g |
| - trans | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 7.7 g | 2.9 g |
| - sugars | 1 g | 2.4 g |
| Sodium | 291 mg | 412 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
Safcol: Skipjack Tuna (Fish) (64%), Vegetable Oil (18%), Water, Salt.
64% tuna
Sirena: POLE & LINE CAUGHT YELLOWFIN TUNA (FISH) (63.2%), ONION (10%), OIL (ONION OIL, SUNFLOWER OIL & EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL) (9.5%), TOMATO (9%), WATER, SEA SALT, SUG
63.2% tuna