Cals
CalsCanned tunaComparePORTVIEW Tuna With 4 Bean Mix 160g vs Safcol Pink Salmon 210g

PORTVIEW Tuna With 4 Bean Mix 160g vs Safcol Pink Salmon 210g

Per 100 g, Safcol Pink Salmon 210g has less sugar (0.1 vs 1.1), less sodium (229 vs 331), more protein (24.7 vs 11.2) than PORTVIEW Tuna With 4 Bean Mix 160g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

PORTVIEW Tuna With 4 Bean Mix 160g
PORTVIEW Tuna With 4 Bean Mix 160gPORTVIEW
vs
Safcol Pink Salmon 210g
Safcol Pink Salmon 210gSafcol
saturated (lower)
0.7 vs 1 g
monounsaturated (higher)
1.7 vs 1.1 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
2.2 vs 1.7 g
trans (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
Energy (lower)
542 vs 556 kJ
Protein (higher)
24.7 vs 11.2 g
Fat, total (lower)
4.1 vs 5 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
0.1 vs 9 g
sugars (lower)
0.1 vs 1.1 g
Sodium (lower)
229 vs 331 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValuePORTVIEWSafcol
Energy556 kJ (133 Cal)542 kJ (130 Cal)
Protein11.2 g24.7 g
Fat, total5 g4.1 g
- saturated0.7 g1 g
- monounsaturated1.7 g1.1 g
- polyunsaturated2.2 g1.7 g
- trans0.1 g1 g
Carbohydrate9 g0.1 g
- sugars1.1 g0.1 g
Dietary fibre3.6 g-
Sodium331 mg229 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

PORTVIEW: see pack
Safcol: INGREDIENTS: PINK SALMON (99%) (Fish), SALT.
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed