Cals
CalsCanned tunaComparePORTVIEW Tuna Pate With Black Pepper Treats with Crackers 112g vs Sirena Tuna With Beans Chilli Italian Style 170g

PORTVIEW Tuna Pate With Black Pepper Treats with Crackers 112g vs Sirena Tuna With Beans Chilli Italian Style 170g

Per 100 g, Sirena Tuna With Beans Chilli Italian Style 170g has less sugar (1 vs 1.3), less saturated fat (1.6 vs 2.4) than PORTVIEW Tuna Pate With Black Pepper Treats with Crackers 112g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

PORTVIEW Tuna Pate With Black Pepper Treats with Crackers 112g
PORTVIEW Tuna Pate With Black Pepper Treats with Crackers 112gPORTVIEW
vs
Sirena Tuna With Beans Chilli Italian Style 170g
Sirena Tuna With Beans Chilli Italian Style 170gSirena
Protein (higher)
14.8 vs 13.6 g
Sodium (lower)
444 vs 590 mg
saturated (lower)
1.6 vs 2.4 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
10.5 vs 11.5 g
sugars (lower)
1 vs 1.3 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValuePORTVIEWSirena
Energy945 kJ (226 Cal)928 kJ (222 Cal)
Protein14.8 g13.6 g
Fat, total12.7 g12.6 g
- saturated2.4 g1.6 g
- monounsaturated-4.1 g
- polyunsaturated-5.9 g
- trans-0.1 g
Carbohydrate11.5 g10.5 g
- sugars1.3 g1 g
Dietary fibre-6.2 g
Sodium444 mg590 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

PORTVIEW: see pack
Sirena: POLE AND LINE CAUGHT YELLOW FIN TUNA (FISH) (24%), CHICKPEA (21.2%), RED KIDNEY BEAN (15%), SOYBEAN (14%), OIL (SUNFLOWER OIL AND EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL), BARLE
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed