Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Springwater 95g vs Sirena Tuna In Springwater 185g
PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Springwater 95g vs Sirena Tuna In Springwater 185g
Per 100 g, PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Springwater 95g has less sugar (0.1 vs 1), less sodium (316 vs 397), less saturated fat (0.3 vs 1) than Sirena Tuna In Springwater 185g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
saturated (lower)
0.3 vs 1 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
sugars (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
Sodium (lower)
316 vs 397 mg
Sirena Tuna In Springwater 185g leads on
monounsaturated (higher)
1 vs 0.1 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
1 vs 0.4 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | PORTVIEW | Sirena |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 460 kJ (110 Cal) | 460 kJ (110 Cal) |
| Protein | 25.6 g | 24.9 g |
| Fat, total | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| - saturated | 0.3 g | 1 g |
| - monounsaturated | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| - polyunsaturated | 0.4 g | 1 g |
| - trans | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| - sugars | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Sodium | 316 mg | 397 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
PORTVIEW: see pack
Sirena: Pole & Line Caught Yellowfin Tuna (FISH) (81%), Sp ringwater (18%), Sea Salt