Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Springwater 185g vs Safcol Salmon In Spring Water 95g
PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Springwater 185g vs Safcol Salmon In Spring Water 95g
Per 100 g, PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Springwater 185g has less sugar (0.1 vs 0.5), less sodium (190 vs 315), less saturated fat (0.2 vs 0.4) than Safcol Salmon In Spring Water 95g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Protein (higher)
23.9 vs 14.6 g
Fat, total (lower)
0.6 vs 1.3 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
0.2 vs 0.5 g
sugars (lower)
0.1 vs 0.5 g
Sodium (lower)
190 vs 315 mg
Safcol Salmon In Spring Water 95g leads on
Energy (lower)
305 vs 431 kJ
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | PORTVIEW | Safcol |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 431 kJ (103 Cal) | 305 kJ (73 Cal) |
| Protein | 23.9 g | 14.6 g |
| Fat, total | 0.6 g | 1.3 g |
| - saturated | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| - monounsaturated | 0.1 g | - |
| - polyunsaturated | 0.2 g | - |
| - trans | 0.1 g | - |
| Carbohydrate | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| - sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sodium | 190 mg | 315 mg |
| Potassium | - | 258 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
PORTVIEW: see pack
Safcol: Premium Salmon (65%), Springwater, Salt (0.5%), Natural Colour (160c) (0.03%).