Cals
CalsCanned tunaComparePORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 95g vs Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120g

PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 95g vs Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120g

Per 100 g, PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 95g has less sodium (362 vs 452), less saturated fat (1 vs 1.1) than Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 95g
PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 95gPORTVIEW
vs
Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120g
Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120gSole Mare
Carbohydrate (lower)
0.1 vs 0.9 g
Sodium (lower)
362 vs 452 mg
Energy (lower)
700 vs 728 kJ
Fat, total (lower)
6.6 vs 8.2 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValuePORTVIEWSole Mare
Energy728 kJ (174 Cal)700 kJ (167 Cal)
Protein25 g26.11 g
Fat, total8.2 g6.6 g
- saturated1 g1.1 g
- monounsaturated2.4 g-
- polyunsaturated3.6 g-
- trans0.1 g-
Carbohydrate0.1 g0.9 g
- sugars0.1 g0 g
Dietary fibre-0 g
Sodium362 mg452 mg
Potassium-0 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

PORTVIEW: see pack
Sole Mare: Mackerel (Fish)(70%), Olive Oil (18%), Water, Salt.
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed