Cals
CalsCanned tunaComparePORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 425g vs Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120g

PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 425g vs Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120g

Per 100 g, PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 425g has less sodium (315 vs 452), less saturated fat (0.9 vs 1.1) than Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 425g
PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 425gPORTVIEW
vs
Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120g
Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120gSole Mare
Carbohydrate (lower)
0.1 vs 0.9 g
Sodium (lower)
315 vs 452 mg
Protein (higher)
26.11 vs 23.9 g
Fat, total (lower)
6.6 vs 7.6 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValuePORTVIEWSole Mare
Energy686 kJ (164 Cal)700 kJ (167 Cal)
Protein23.9 g26.11 g
Fat, total7.6 g6.6 g
- saturated0.9 g1.1 g
- monounsaturated2 g-
- polyunsaturated3.9 g-
- trans0.1 g-
Carbohydrate0.1 g0.9 g
- sugars0.1 g0 g
Dietary fibre-0 g
Sodium315 mg452 mg
Potassium-0 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

PORTVIEW: see pack
Sole Mare: Mackerel (Fish)(70%), Olive Oil (18%), Water, Salt.
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed