Cals
CalsCanned tunaComparePORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 185g vs Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120g

PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 185g vs Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120g

Per 100 g, Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120g has less sugar (0 vs 0.1), less sodium (452 vs 502), more protein (26.11 vs 23.5) than PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 185g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 185g
PORTVIEW Tuna Chunks in Oil 185gPORTVIEW
vs
Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120g
Sole Mare Mackerel Fillets In Olive Oil 120gSole Mare
Energy (lower)
647 vs 700 kJ
Protein (higher)
26.11 vs 23.5 g
Sodium (lower)
452 vs 502 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValuePORTVIEWSole Mare
Energy647 kJ (155 Cal)700 kJ (167 Cal)
Protein23.5 g26.11 g
Fat, total6.3 g6.6 g
- saturated0.9 g1.1 g
- monounsaturated1.6 g-
- polyunsaturated3.6 g-
- trans0.1 g-
Carbohydrate0.8 g0.9 g
- sugars0.1 g0 g
Dietary fibre-0 g
Sodium502 mg452 mg
Potassium-0 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

PORTVIEW: see pack
Sole Mare: Mackerel (Fish)(70%), Olive Oil (18%), Water, Salt.
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed