Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › PORTVIEW Thai Sweet Chilli Flavour Tuna Treats with Crackers 112g vs Sirena Tuna Paella 170g

PORTVIEW Thai Sweet Chilli Flavour Tuna Treats with Crackers 112g vs Sirena Tuna Paella 170g

Per 100 g, PORTVIEW Thai Sweet Chilli Flavour Tuna Treats with Crackers 112g has less sodium (338 vs 457), more protein (16 vs 10.1) than Sirena Tuna Paella 170g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

PORTVIEW Thai Sweet Chilli Flavour Tuna Treats with Crackers 112gPORTVIEW

Sirena Tuna Paella 170gSirena

PORTVIEW Thai Sweet Chilli Flavour Tuna Treats with Crackers 112g leads on

Protein (higher)

16 vs 10.1 g

Fat, total (lower)

8.2 vs 10.5 g

Carbohydrate (lower)

16.7 vs 17.8 g

Sodium (lower)

338 vs 457 mg

Sirena Tuna Paella 170g leads on

saturated (lower)

1.2 vs 2 g

sugars (lower)

1.1 vs 5.6 g

Side by side, per 100 g

Value	PORTVIEW	Sirena
Energy	869 kJ (208 Cal)	874 kJ (209 Cal)
Protein	16 g	10.1 g
Fat, total	8.2 g	10.5 g
- saturated	2 g	1.2 g
- monounsaturated	-	3.3 g
- polyunsaturated	-	4 g
- trans	-	0.1 g
Carbohydrate	16.7 g	17.8 g
- sugars	5.6 g	1.1 g
Dietary fibre	-	1.5 g
Sodium	338 mg	457 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

PORTVIEW: see pack

Sirena: BROWN RICE (32%), POLE & LINE CAUGHT SKIPJACK TUNA(FISH) (20%), OIL (SUNFLOWER SEED OIL AND EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL), TOMATO, RED ONION, CAPSICUM (5%), GREEN BEA