Cals
CalsCanned tunaComparePORTVIEW Sweet Chilli & Onion Tuna 95g vs Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g

PORTVIEW Sweet Chilli & Onion Tuna 95g vs Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g

Per 100 g, Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g has less sugar (5.7 vs 10.6), less sodium (400 vs 580), more protein (16.6 vs 13.8) than PORTVIEW Sweet Chilli & Onion Tuna 95g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

PORTVIEW Sweet Chilli & Onion Tuna 95g
PORTVIEW Sweet Chilli & Onion Tuna 95gPORTVIEW
vs
Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g
Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g50% tuna
Fat, total (lower)
3.8 vs 4.3 g
saturated (lower)
0.5 vs 1 g
trans (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
Energy (lower)
540 vs 566 kJ
Protein (higher)
16.6 vs 13.8 g
monounsaturated (higher)
1.2 vs 0.9 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
2.5 vs 2.2 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
6 vs 10.7 g
sugars (lower)
5.7 vs 10.6 g
Sodium (lower)
400 vs 580 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValuePORTVIEWSafcol
Energy566 kJ (135 Cal)540 kJ (129 Cal)
Protein13.8 g16.6 g
Fat, total3.8 g4.3 g
- saturated0.5 g1 g
- monounsaturated0.9 g1.2 g
- polyunsaturated2.2 g2.5 g
- trans0.1 g1 g
Carbohydrate10.7 g6 g
- sugars10.6 g5.7 g
Sodium580 mg400 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

PORTVIEW: see pack
Safcol: Skipjack Tuna (Fish) (50%), Sweet Chilli Sauce (35%) (Water, Sunflower Oil, Sugar, Salt, Thickener (Modified Tapioca Starch, Xanthan Gum), Natural Colour (Papri
50% tuna
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed