Cals
CalsCanned tunaComparePORTVIEW Smoke Flavoured Tuna Pate Treats with Crackers 112g vs Sirena Tuna With Beans Chilli Italian Style 170g

PORTVIEW Smoke Flavoured Tuna Pate Treats with Crackers 112g vs Sirena Tuna With Beans Chilli Italian Style 170g

Per 100 g, PORTVIEW Smoke Flavoured Tuna Pate Treats with Crackers 112g has less sodium (421 vs 590), more protein (16 vs 13.6) than Sirena Tuna With Beans Chilli Italian Style 170g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

PORTVIEW Smoke Flavoured Tuna Pate Treats with Crackers 112g
PORTVIEW Smoke Flavoured Tuna Pate Treats with Crackers 112gPORTVIEW
vs
Sirena Tuna With Beans Chilli Italian Style 170g
Sirena Tuna With Beans Chilli Italian Style 170gSirena
Protein (higher)
16 vs 13.6 g
Fat, total (lower)
10.9 vs 12.6 g
Sodium (lower)
421 vs 590 mg
saturated (lower)
1.6 vs 2.4 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
10.5 vs 12.5 g
sugars (lower)
1 vs 1.3 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValuePORTVIEWSirena
Energy911 kJ (218 Cal)928 kJ (222 Cal)
Protein16 g13.6 g
Fat, total10.9 g12.6 g
- saturated2.4 g1.6 g
- monounsaturated-4.1 g
- polyunsaturated-5.9 g
- trans-0.1 g
Carbohydrate12.5 g10.5 g
- sugars1.3 g1 g
Dietary fibre-6.2 g
Sodium421 mg590 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

PORTVIEW: see pack
Sirena: POLE AND LINE CAUGHT YELLOW FIN TUNA (FISH) (24%), CHICKPEA (21.2%), RED KIDNEY BEAN (15%), SOYBEAN (14%), OIL (SUNFLOWER OIL AND EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL), BARLE
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed