Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › PORTVIEW Mayo & Sweetcorn Tuna 95g vs Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g
PORTVIEW Mayo & Sweetcorn Tuna 95g vs Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g
Per 100 g, PORTVIEW Mayo & Sweetcorn Tuna 95g has less sugar (1.9 vs 5.7), less sodium (230 vs 400), less saturated fat (0.9 vs 1) than Safcol Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Chilli 95g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
PORTVIEW Mayo & Sweetcorn Tuna 95g leads on
polyunsaturated (higher)
2.9 vs 2.5 g
trans (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
5.1 vs 6 g
sugars (lower)
1.9 vs 5.7 g
Sodium (lower)
230 vs 400 mg
Energy (lower)
540 vs 577 kJ
Fat, total (lower)
4.3 vs 5.8 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | PORTVIEW | Safcol |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 577 kJ (138 Cal) | 540 kJ (129 Cal) |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 16.6 g |
| Fat, total | 5.8 g | 4.3 g |
| - saturated | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| - monounsaturated | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| - polyunsaturated | 2.9 g | 2.5 g |
| - trans | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 5.1 g | 6 g |
| - sugars | 1.9 g | 5.7 g |
| Sodium | 230 mg | 400 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
PORTVIEW: see pack
Safcol: Skipjack Tuna (Fish) (50%), Sweet Chilli Sauce (35%) (Water, Sunflower Oil, Sugar, Salt, Thickener (Modified Tapioca Starch, Xanthan Gum), Natural Colour (Papri
50% tuna