Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › PORTVIEW Mango Chilli Tuna 95g vs Sirena Tuna In Lite Italian Style Oil 425g
PORTVIEW Mango Chilli Tuna 95g vs Sirena Tuna In Lite Italian Style Oil 425g
Per 100 g, PORTVIEW Mango Chilli Tuna 95g has less sodium (337 vs 519), less saturated fat (0.5 vs 1) than Sirena Tuna In Lite Italian Style Oil 425g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
PORTVIEW Mango Chilli Tuna 95g leads on
Energy (lower)
517 vs 529 kJ
Fat, total (lower)
2.2 vs 3.3 g
saturated (lower)
0.5 vs 1 g
Sodium (lower)
337 vs 519 mg
Protein (higher)
26 vs 14.6 g
monounsaturated (higher)
2.6 vs 0.5 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
0.1 vs 10.4 g
sugars (lower)
0.1 vs 9.6 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | PORTVIEW | Sirena |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 517 kJ (124 Cal) | 529 kJ (126 Cal) |
| Protein | 14.6 g | 26 g |
| Fat, total | 2.2 g | 3.3 g |
| - saturated | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| - monounsaturated | 0.5 g | 2.6 g |
| - polyunsaturated | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| - trans | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 10.4 g | 0.1 g |
| - sugars | 9.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Sodium | 337 mg | 519 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
PORTVIEW: see pack
Sirena: POLE AND LINE YELLOWFIN TUNA (FISH) (71%), WATER, EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL (3.8%), SEA SALT.