Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › John West Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 105g vs Safcol Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g
John West Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 105g vs Safcol Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g
Per 100 g, John West Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 105g has less sodium (365 vs 382), more protein (23 vs 20.7) than Safcol Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
Protein (higher)
23 vs 20.7 g
Fat, total (lower)
5.3 vs 6.2 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
2.2 vs 1.9 g
Safcol Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon 415g leads on
monounsaturated (higher)
2.2 vs 1.7 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | John West | Safcol |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 588 kJ (141 Cal) | 579 kJ (138 Cal) |
| Protein | 23 g | 20.7 g |
| Fat, total | 5.3 g | 6.2 g |
| - saturated | 1.6 g | 1.4 g |
| - monounsaturated | 1.7 g | 2.2 g |
| - polyunsaturated | 2.2 g | 1.9 g |
| - trans | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 1 g | 1 g |
| - sugars | 1 g | 1 g |
| Sodium | 365 mg | 382 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
John West: Salmon (*fish*), salt.
Safcol: PINK SALMON (Fish) (99%), SALT.