Cals
Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › John West Tuna With Chilli Tempters 95g vs Sirena Tuna Lemon Italian Style 95g

John West Tuna With Chilli Tempters 95g vs Sirena Tuna Lemon Italian Style 95g

Per 100 g, Sirena Tuna Lemon Italian Style 95g has less sugar (0.1 vs 1), less saturated fat (1 vs 1.6), more protein (25.2 vs 18.8) than John West Tuna With Chilli Tempters 95g.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

John West Tuna With Chilli Tempters 95g
John West Tuna With Chilli Tempters 95gJohn West
vs
Sirena Tuna Lemon Italian Style 95g
Sirena Tuna Lemon Italian Style 95gSirena
polyunsaturated (higher)
5.4 vs 3.1 g
Sodium (lower)
400 vs 463 mg
Protein (higher)
25.2 vs 18.8 g
Fat, total (lower)
6.5 vs 9.1 g
saturated (lower)
1 vs 1.6 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g
sugars (lower)
0.1 vs 1 g

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueJohn WestSirena
Energy656 kJ (157 Cal)668 kJ (160 Cal)
Protein18.8 g25.2 g
Fat, total9.1 g6.5 g
- saturated1.6 g1 g
- monounsaturated2.1 g2.1 g
- polyunsaturated5.4 g3.1 g
- trans0.1 g0.1 g
Carbohydrate1 g0.1 g
- sugars1 g0.1 g
Dietary fibre0 g0.1 g
Sodium400 mg463 mg
Potassium0 mg-

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

John West: MSC certified purse seine caught skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) (*fish*) (56%), water, vegetable oil, chilli (2.5%), salt, garlic.
Sirena: POLE AND LINE CAUGHT YELLOWFIN TUNA (FISH) (67.3%), OIL (SUNFLOWER SEED OIL AND EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL), PRESERVED LEMON (7%) (LEMON, WATER, SALT), SEA SALT.
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed