Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › John West Tuna Bowl Rice & Quinoa 220g vs PORTVIEW Tuna Power Bowl Iron 170g
John West Tuna Bowl Rice & Quinoa 220g vs PORTVIEW Tuna Power Bowl Iron 170g
Per 100 g, PORTVIEW Tuna Power Bowl Iron 170g has less saturated fat (0.6 vs 0.9), more protein (15 vs 9.5) than John West Tuna Bowl Rice & Quinoa 220g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
monounsaturated (higher)
2.6 vs 1.3 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
3.5 vs 2.3 g
PORTVIEW Tuna Power Bowl Iron 170g leads on
Energy (lower)
606 vs 620 kJ
Protein (higher)
15 vs 9.5 g
Fat, total (lower)
5 vs 7 g
saturated (lower)
0.6 vs 0.9 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
9 vs 11.1 g
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | John West | PORTVIEW |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 620 kJ (148 Cal) | 606 kJ (145 Cal) |
| Protein | 9.5 g | 15 g |
| Fat, total | 7 g | 5 g |
| - saturated | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| - monounsaturated | 2.6 g | 1.3 g |
| - polyunsaturated | 3.5 g | 2.3 g |
| - trans | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 11.1 g | 9 g |
| - sugars | 1.7 g | 1.9 g |
| Dietary fibre | 1.3 g | - |
| Sodium | 304 mg | 307 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
John West: MSC certified purse seine caught skipjack *tuna* (Katsuwonus pelamis) (*fish*) (32%), vegetables (red capsicum (14%), sweet corn (11%), onion), cooked brown ric
PORTVIEW: see pack