Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › John West Salmon With Tomato & Onion 95g vs PORTVIEW Tuna Power Bowl Iron 170g
John West Salmon With Tomato & Onion 95g vs PORTVIEW Tuna Power Bowl Iron 170g
Per 100 g, PORTVIEW Tuna Power Bowl Iron 170g has less sugar (1.9 vs 4.7), less sodium (307 vs 340), less saturated fat (0.6 vs 0.9) than John West Salmon With Tomato & Onion 95g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
monounsaturated (higher)
2.8 vs 1.3 g
polyunsaturated (higher)
4.2 vs 2.3 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
5.1 vs 9 g
PORTVIEW Tuna Power Bowl Iron 170g leads on
Protein (higher)
15 vs 13.3 g
Fat, total (lower)
5 vs 7.9 g
saturated (lower)
0.6 vs 0.9 g
sugars (lower)
1.9 vs 4.7 g
Sodium (lower)
307 vs 340 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | John West | PORTVIEW |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 615 kJ (147 Cal) | 606 kJ (145 Cal) |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 15 g |
| Fat, total | 7.9 g | 5 g |
| - saturated | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| - monounsaturated | 2.8 g | 1.3 g |
| - polyunsaturated | 4.2 g | 2.3 g |
| - trans | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Carbohydrate | 5.1 g | 9 g |
| - sugars | 4.7 g | 1.9 g |
| Sodium | 340 mg | 307 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
John West: Salmon (*fish*) (48%), onion (23%), water, vegetable oil, vinegar, sugar, tomato paste (1.5%), salt, dextrose, spices (includes chilli, celery), garlic powder,
PORTVIEW: see pack