Cals
CalsCanned tunaCompareJohn West Salmon In Springwater Value 95g x 3 pack vs Safcol Salmon In Spring Water 95g

John West Salmon In Springwater Value 95g x 3 pack vs Safcol Salmon In Spring Water 95g

Per 100 g, Safcol Salmon In Spring Water 95g has less sugar (0.5 vs 1), less sodium (315 vs 350), less saturated fat (0.4 vs 0.8) than John West Salmon In Springwater Value 95g x 3 pack.

Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.

John West Salmon In Springwater Value 95g x 3 pack
John West Salmon In Springwater Value 95g x 3 packJohn West
vs
Safcol Salmon In Spring Water 95g
Safcol Salmon In Spring Water 95gSafcol
Protein (higher)
17 vs 14.6 g
Energy (lower)
305 vs 374 kJ
Fat, total (lower)
1.3 vs 2.3 g
saturated (lower)
0.4 vs 0.8 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
0.5 vs 1 g
sugars (lower)
0.5 vs 1 g
Sodium (lower)
315 vs 350 mg

Side by side, per 100 g

ValueJohn WestSafcol
Energy374 kJ (89 Cal)305 kJ (73 Cal)
Protein17 g14.6 g
Fat, total2.3 g1.3 g
- saturated0.8 g0.4 g
- monounsaturated0.8 g-
- polyunsaturated0.7 g-
- trans0.1 g-
Carbohydrate1 g0.5 g
- sugars1 g0.5 g
Sodium350 mg315 mg
Potassium-258 mg

✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.

What’s in each tin

John West: Salmon (*fish*) (60%), springwater, salt, colour (paprika oleoresins).
Safcol: Premium Salmon (65%), Springwater, Salt (0.5%), Natural Colour (160c) (0.03%).
Browsing Canned tuna · rankings · finder · what changed