Cals › Canned tuna › Compare › John West Salmon In Springwater 95g vs Safcol Salmon In Spring Water 95g
John West Salmon In Springwater 95g vs Safcol Salmon In Spring Water 95g
Per 100 g, Safcol Salmon In Spring Water 95g has less sugar (0.5 vs 1), less sodium (315 vs 350), less saturated fat (0.4 vs 0.8) than John West Salmon In Springwater 95g.
Same aisle, measurably different composition. Every number is verified against independent supplier feeds and the labels photographed on pack.
John West Salmon In Springwater 95g leads on
Protein (higher)
18.9 vs 14.6 g
Safcol Salmon In Spring Water 95g leads on
Energy (lower)
305 vs 406 kJ
Fat, total (lower)
1.3 vs 2.3 g
saturated (lower)
0.4 vs 0.8 g
Carbohydrate (lower)
0.5 vs 1 g
sugars (lower)
0.5 vs 1 g
Sodium (lower)
315 vs 350 mg
Side by side, per 100 g
| Value | John West | Safcol |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 406 kJ (97 Cal) | 305 kJ (73 Cal) |
| Protein | 18.9 g | 14.6 g |
| Fat, total | 2.3 g | 1.3 g |
| - saturated | 0.8 g | 0.4 g |
| - monounsaturated | 0.8 g | - |
| - polyunsaturated | 0.7 g | - |
| - trans | 0.1 g | - |
| Carbohydrate | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| - sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sodium | 350 mg | 315 mg |
| Potassium | - | 258 mg |
✓ marks a difference beyond label-rounding tolerance.
What’s in each tin
John West: Salmon (*fish*) (60%), springwater, salt, colour (paprika oleoresins).
Safcol: Premium Salmon (65%), Springwater, Salt (0.5%), Natural Colour (160c) (0.03%).